I used Google. It’s my go-to for searching.
I used Boolean searching and it worked pretty well. I got some
pretty good results.
The first thing I did when I came across a search
result that I thought I might include I would first look at who wrote it, who
published it, and how old it was. Though I found it hard to find things that
were more current, most of the things I would find were between 2006 and 20010,
I still think they are relevant to current time.
1. Chai, Sangmi, Sharmistha Bagchi-Sen,
Claudia Morrell, H. R. Rao, and Shambhu J. Upadhyaya. "Internet and Online
Information Privacy: An Exploratory Study of Preteens and Early Teens." IEEE
Transactions on Professional Communication 52.2 (2009): 167-82. Print.
I chose this
information because the database that published it was credible and I found the
article to be thorough.
2. Christiana, Joe, and Richard Goettke.
"Privacy and Online Social Networking Websites." Computer Science
199r Special Topics in Computer Science Computation and Society: Privacy and Technology.
Harvard University, 14 May 2007. Web. 1 Aug.2012.<http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/cs199r/fp/RichJoe.pdf>.
I chose this
article because Harvard University is credible and well known. I also chose
this article because it was among a group of graduate papers that scored the
highest in the class which tells me the students did their research
appropriately.
3. Flatow, Ira. "Protecting Your
Privacy On Social Networking Sites." Audio blog post. NPR. PBS, 21
May 2010. Web. 1 Aug. 2012. <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127037413>.
I chose this because it was a radio show on NPR. Though very
much an opinion show it was still very informative and the host was well
educated on the topic. The host also had very good intentions when the show was
taking place. It related well to what I was looking for.
4. "11 Tips for Social Networking
Safety." Social Networking Safety. Microsoft, 24 July 2010. Web. 01
Aug. 2012.
<http://www.microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/social-networking.aspx>.
The credibility here should be obvious to many. I
personally am not a fan of Microsoft but it is more of product reliability than
how knowledgeable they are. They are all about computers and tech advancement
so I feel they are a good source to use. I also feel the intent of the article
is a good fit for what I’m researching.
Hi, Jaquelin:
ReplyDeleteThank you for your thorough report. You didn't indicate if one of the domains was easier to find useful information and seemed better suited for your topic? It looks like you found relevant articles/websites in each domain. Though, I was a bit confused, was the IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication your .gov website? I found it as a .org, part of the IEEE website a highly reliable source.
It seems like you have a pretty good search strategy including evaluating your results that should serve you well in the future.
Cheers,
Andrea